FIRST THINGS FIRST: I haven’t had time to investigate for myself, but Frequent Miler’s latest post about a great deal at KMart / Sears is intriguing and I recommend you read it if you have a Sears near you.
THE END IS NEAR: Fascinating stuff from Cranky Flier via View From the Wing! Apparently the airlines have raised enough of a fuss over being forced to honor mistake fares that the DOT is now considering changing the rules. Gary writes:
The rulemaking reveals the Department of Transportation’s intention to weaken one aspect of existing consumer protections.
The DOT has required airlines to honor prices, even when those prices were a mistake (14 CFR 399.88). They wanted air carriers to own their prices no matter what.
They didn’t require United to honor 4 mile award tickets to and through Hong Kong, but United displayed the ‘correct’ price throughout the booking process and only dropped price at the end.
This tilted things in a really strong direction for consumers overall. It also upended the traditional notion of obvious mistake, that no contract could have been formed if parties didn’t actually intend to strike a bargain at a particular price.
Here’s the relevant passage from the DOT notice of proposed rulemaking:
“Individual bad actors”? I love it!
I’ve never capitalized on a mistake fare, so I don’t really have a dog in this fight. But one thing I recall seeing on Flyertalk is how a few folks would muster up a ridiculous sense of moral outrage at companies that did not want to honor a mistake fare.
I can understand disappointment if the mistake fare isn’t honored, but outrage? Really? Is it really that big of a deal if you can’t fly to Scotland for $3.50 when the deal was obviously a result of somebody pressing the wrong key?
Anyway… Gary points out, “I have no idea how the Department of Transportation is going to write a rule that would parse whether a fare was obviously a mistake to a consumer or whether a consumer was duped by a good deal that the travel provider tried to raise the price on later.”
Great point, I have no idea how you’d do that either. I’d be surprised if the airlines don’t get their way, though, unless the Flyertalk has some high-priced Washington lobbyists I’m unaware of. Industries these days usually get to write their own rules, so enjoy those mistake fares while you can.
Deltahater says
I think the header is very misleading and a bit sensationalistic, don’t you think?
For all we know, the DOT will clarify the rule to include mistake fares specifically. This just shows how much lobbying pressure the DOT is under from high paid corporate lawyers. Airlines rather pay $1,000,000 in legal fees than provide $500,000 worth of discounted travel. See LX and RGN
pfdigest says
Sensationalistic, absolutely! I don’t think it’s misleading, as it’s a possible (and IMHO a likely) outcome.
Robert says
My last change in flights from the following segments: JFK-GVA-ZRH-MUC with LH in X and return MUC-FRA in I with LH plus FRA-ORD-LGA in I with UA into this one: JFK-VIE in I with OS and VIE-MUC, MU-BRU in X with LH and finally BRU-JFK in X with SN resulted in credit of 7,500 UA miles. Instead of 87,500 miles my trip cost me 80,000 miles and I could not have understood it why. Any suggestions? 🙂