• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Saverocity
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Support the Site
  • The Free-quent Flyer

Independently Financed

Independently Financed

“Use it or lose it” is the most important feature of retirement accounts

April 28, 2020 by indyfinance 4 Comments

Become a Patron!

I consider it an inevitable misfortune that conversations about investing begin and end with “what should I invest in?” An unsophisticated questioner might mean “what stocks do you think will go up?” while a sophisticated one means “what should my allocation be to low-cost stock and bond ETF’s?” but both questions skip over the much more important question: how much are you saving?

Pre-tax savings are cheap

You can pay a financial advisor to game out different tax regimes and withdrawal scenarios, but there’s nothing complicated about calculating your tax savings when you make traditional 401(k) and IRA contributions: every dollar you save reduces your taxes by your marginal federal and state income tax rate, and this is true in every marginal income tax bracket.

In the 10% income tax bracket, putting $6,000 into a traditional IRA saves you $600 to do with as you please. You can then save the $600, if you like, but you don’t have to: you can use it to pay down credit card debt, pay rent, buy a Nintendo Switch, whatever you please!

When I talk to people about their 401(k) or 403(b) contributions, they often balk when I say they need to set their contribution to $1,625 per month in order to maximize their annual contribution. How are they going to get by with $1,625 less per month in salary? They’re going to get by because a $1,625 contribution doesn’t cost them anything close to that much. In the 22% federal income tax bracket and with a 10% state income tax, it barely costs them $1100.

And, to return to the point, this is true regardless of what they invest in.

There is no such thing as a catch-up contribution

I detest imprecision in speech, which is why I call the Retirement Savings Contribution Credit the RSCC and not the Saver’s Credit and why I call the Earned Income Credit the EIC and not the EITC. The way I see it, imprecision in speech usually reflects imprecision in thought.

One of the most offensive such imprecisions is the conceit of the “catch-up contribution.” In 2020, people over the age of 50 enrolled in either employer-sponsored or individual 401(k) plans can contribute an additional $6,500 per year in employee contributions, for a total of up to $26,000, and an additional $1,000 to IRA’s for a total of up to $7,000. If able, they should certainly do so.

This bonus pre-tax savings capacity for over-50’s is referred to universally as a “catch-up contribution,” on the premise that those who failed to save enough earlier in life should be given a chance to make up their missed savings opportunities.

But this is absurd, since the amount of the “catch-up” contribution has no relationship to the amount by which a saver has “fallen behind.” For those wealthy enough to save the maximum amount in pre-tax accounts throughout their working life, it’s a windfall, while those who struggled to save anything at all are unlikely to find an extra $7,500 per year in income to defer in their last few years before retirement.

Use it or lose it

Personal finance gurus love to talk about giving your investments as much time as possible to compound, with their smoothly rising charts that inevitably look silly in the midst of capitalism’s periodic crises.

Forget all that for a moment: the reason to contribute as much as possible each year to retirement accounts is that once that year’s contribution deadline has passed, you have permanently lost the ability to shield that year’s contribution from taxes.

If you don’t know what to invest in, save anyway

In recent years there has been a half-hearted movement to channel savers into simplified, lower-cost investing vehicles. I don’t hold this movement in very high esteem, but it has certainly had some successes: allowing auto-enrollment into 401(k) plans, allowing automatic increases in contributions, and allowing automatic allocation into so-called “target retirement date” mutual funds.

But fortunately, it doesn’t matter very much. In constant-dollar terms (i.e., removing annual inflation adjustments), someone saving $19,500 per year between age 22 and 50, and $26,000 per year between age 50 and 67, will have accumulated $988,000 in savings even if their savings do not earn any interest at all.

Conclusion: hitch the savings horse before the investment cart

At the end of the day, investing for high-income, white-collar professionals is pretty boring: the only question is, how rich do you want to be when you die? If you want to be really rich, you can take on a riskier investment portfolio, and if you’re content with being only somewhat rich, you can happily dial back your risk. The stakes are essentially non-existent.

My point is that even poor, low-income people like me, with no advice whatsoever, and taking no risk whatsoever, can also die rich, not by maximizing their investment performance, but by maximizing their savings performance. Invested entirely in cash (not an allocation I would recommend!), a pre-tax saver will still see their 401(k) and IRA balances steadily rise over the course of their working life, while happily taking advantage of both an annual tax deduction and, for low-income savers, the RSCC.

Become a Patron!

Filed Under: investing, personal finance

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. ArmyDoc says

    April 30, 2020 at 7:38 am

    I agree – the key is savings, much more important than the nuts and bolts of investing.

    Re: imprecision in language, consider using “high income” rather than “wealthy” in the sentence “For those wealthy enough to save …” I live in a world with many high income, not wealthy people. I would argue that savings is what turns people into wealthy people, and I agree completely that savings is much more painless when one is high income.

    You may be surprised to see how many “high income” people do NOT max their contributions early, and actually use the “catch up” literally to catch up. Also, there are “middle income” people who don’t max contributions early, who panic at age 50 when they realize they have missed an opportunity and also start “catching up” (but agree – this is often too little too late.)

    I’m curious to hear your perspective on the “nudge” of auto enrolling workers and why you have little respect for it. For the military, it has improved savings rates and account balances, and can be adjusted by those who don’t want to participate.

    Reply
    • indyfinance says

      May 6, 2020 at 3:28 pm

      ArmyDoc,

      I’ve worked with a lot of high-income people, and a lot of wealthy people, which is why I expressed myself the way I did: high-income people are not particularly good at saving, and in fact in my experience it’s almost impossible to convince them to do so. Wealthy people are great at saving and don’t require much encouragement at all (although they are typically terrible at picking their investments and advisors). The principle function of tax-advantaged retirement accounts is and has always been to allow wealthy people to move their taxable investments into tax-shielded accounts.

      My point about “catching up” is simply that it is not true: you are entitled to make so-called “catch-up” contributions whether or not you made contributions before age 50, and the amount of your “catch-up” contribution isn’t linked to the amount by which you fell short earlier in life. If everyone gets an identical increase in maximum contribution, the increase by definition isn’t linked to the amount by which one “fell short” or needs to “catch up” later in life, so that’s an absurd and inaccurate way to describe the increased contribution cap.

      Re: “nudges,” I simply don’t think voluntary workplace-based savings vehicles are a realistic method of ensuring a dignified retirement. I don’t have any objection to people saving money, but universal social insurance programs are the only method ever conceived that has actually reduced elder poverty, and they’ve been phenomenally successful. The more we attempt to shunt earnings into investment vehicles, the more precarious retirement income will become, however effective those attempts are, because it makes income in retirement contingent on one’s personal saving rate and investment decisions, and no one’s dignity in retirement should be contingent on their personal saving rate and investment decisions, because people are terrible at saving and investing!

      —Indy

      Reply
  2. ed says

    May 29, 2020 at 1:04 pm

    The money shot really is “when I say they need to set their contribution to $1,625 per month in order to maximize their annual contribution…. it barely costs them $1100”

    If program like TurboTax/Mint.com would help show the estimated (or last year’s) tradeoff, I think more people save. It’s nice to see what my marginal rate of taxation is, but making that information meaningful and actionable makes a lot of … cents.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Five profitable things to do with low-interest loans - Independently Financed says:
    June 24, 2020 at 6:02 pm

    […] accelerate “use it or lose it” retirement contributions. I’ve written before that “use it or lose it” is the most important feature of retirement accounts. When you let a calendar year’s contribution deadline pass (usually that year’s tax […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • MEUC: the unemployment insurance top-up no one is talking about
  • How to apply to, enroll in, and attend college
  • Book Review: Ron Lieber just wants to ask questions about college costs (that have obvious answers)
  • The right and wrong lessons from the Gamestop trading fiasco
  • Good reasons to own bonds

Recent Comments

  • Patty on The Robinhood free stock catch (and an easy workaround)
  • A Different T-Mobile Tuesday – Miles Earn and Burn on Smart people overestimate the difficulty of maximizing the interest earned on savings
  • MEUC: the unemployment insurance top-up no one is talking about - Independently Financed on My successful Economic Injury Disaster Loan story
  • indyfinance on How to apply to, enroll in, and attend college
  • calwatch on How to apply to, enroll in, and attend college

Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017

Categories

  • affordable luxuries
  • better billionaire project
  • book review
  • cheap lessons
  • fire
  • free business idea
  • health insurance
  • higher education
  • investing
  • over there
  • personal finance
  • rant
  • real estate
  • self-employment
  • social security
  • student loans
  • taxes
  • Uncategorized

Newsletter

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

This website uses cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze traffic. Our ad partners may combine this information with other information you have provided them or that they've collected from your use of their services elsewhere. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.OkNoRead more