• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Saverocity
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Support the Site
  • The Free-quent Flyer

Independently Financed

Independently Financed

The stock buyback “controversy” is everything wrong with the finance sector in a nutshell

August 20, 2018 by indyfinance 3 Comments

In the wake of the Republican smash-and-grab tax heist of 2017, many American corporations have had to decide what to do with their freshly repatriated profits and newly distended profit margins, so news junkies have been treated to an extended conversation about investment, payroll, and capital structure. This conversation has been complicated by the insistence of one particular party to the controversy on lying about what’s going on.

What can a company do with money?

I’m not speaking specifically of profits here. Lots of companies that don’t have any profits at all still have plenty of money: the money of their lenders and shareholders, for instance. Uber has money and no profits, Berkshire Hathaway has profits and money, and my sole proprietorship has profits but no money (since the profits are distributed to me every month, or whenever else I want).

But once a company has money, it has to decide what to do with it.

  • A company can, of course, retain the cash, as many corporations did in their “foreign” subsidiaries for years while waiting for the opportunity to repatriate it cheaply.
  • A company can spend the cash, for example on expanding operations, raising wages, giving employees bonuses, or buying new equipment.
  • A company can pay out the money in dividends to shareholders.
  • A company can pay down or retire its outstanding debt.
  • Or a company can buy back its shares on the open market.

364 days a year financiers are perfectly honest about stock buybacks

Corporate profits in the United States are supposed to be taxed twice: once at the corporation level, and a second time when profits are distributed to shareholders. Long-term capital gains and qualified dividends are taxed at preferential levels for precisely this reason: corporate profits are taxed once at the corporation’s tax rate, then a second time at a rate depending on the shareholder’s taxable income (as low as 0%).

364 days out of the year, financial professionals are happy to tell you why they like stock buybacks: since stock buybacks are voluntary (it’s up to the shareholder whether or not to participate), the second step of taxation can be avoided, managed, or minimized.

A company can reduce its share count (increasing the proportional stake in the business of remaining shareholders, and their claim on future profits), without requiring the remaining shareholders to pay taxes on the increased value of their stake. In other words, share buybacks are a way for corporations to manage the individual income tax liability of their shareholders.

To be clear, dividends also allow shareholders to increase their stake in a company and their share of its future profits. If a company distributes a dividend to every shareholder and half the shareholders reinvest the dividend in the company and the other half do not, the half that reinvested the dividend have a higher proportional claim on the company’s future profits than the half that don’t, just as shareholders that don’t participate in a buyback have a higher proportional claim on future profits than shareholders that do.

This is what financiers mean when they say buybacks and dividends are “theoretically” identical. The difference is that all dividend recipients, those who choose to reinvest their dividend and those who don’t, are properly assessed income tax on the amount of their distribution.

On the 365th day, they tell the most preposterous lies

In the abstract of a forthcoming paper by Cliff Assmess of AQR Capital Management, titled “Buyback Derangement Syndrome,” he writes:

“The popular press is replete with commentary seeking to damn the behavior of corporate managers in handing free cash flow back into the hands of shareholders. These criticisms are often, even regularly, without merit (at least merit that can be demonstrated), sometimes glaringly so. Aggregate share repurchase activity has not been at historical highs when measured properly, and when netted against debt issuance is almost a non-event, does not mechanically create earnings (EPS) growth, does not stifle aggregate investment activity, and has not been the primary cause for recent stock market strength. These myths should be discarded.”

But this is nonsense. The problem with share buybacks is not that they “mechanically create earnings growth,” nor that they “stifle aggregate investment activity,” nor that they “cause…stock market strength.” 

The problem with share buybacks is that they let corporations distribute profits to shareholders selectively, as Cliff would be happy to tell you the 364 days a year he’s not lying about why he likes them.

If you think buybacks and dividends are the same, let’s treat them the same

I don’t see any reason why share buybacks should be legal, but if the sages of our engorged and indulged finance industry think share buybacks are identical to dividend distributions, then let’s treat them identically. I have no objection to a company forcing all of its shareholders to sell back a certain percentage of their shares, thereby maintaining their proportional ownership of the company but reducing the number of outstanding shares — and resulting in the same tax liability on shareholders as a dividend distribution.

Conclusion

The pro-buyback propaganda sweeping the investment management space is just one recent example of a longstanding problem that has infected American discourse in a lot of different fields, and that the internet and social media have made more apparent in a lot of ways.

In earlier eras it may have been possible to deliver different messages to different audiences: “buybacks are a straightforward way to avoid capital gains taxes” to your investors and “buybacks are identical to dividends in every way and you’re an idiot for thinking otherwise” to any regulators who came snooping around your capital structure.

But today it’s a lot harder to get away with. If investment managers think the preferential tax treatment of stock buybacks is a good thing, they’re going to have to start defending it on the merits, if there are, indeed, any merits to defend.

Needless to say, I have my doubts.

Filed Under: investing

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. ucipass says

    August 22, 2018 at 8:55 am

    So, you stated the problem nicely, but it was hard for me to understand what your exact proposed solution you have for the problem. No capital gain tax or also tax stock buyback. Perhaps I did not read it carefully…..

    Reply
    • indyfinance says

      August 22, 2018 at 6:28 pm

      ucipass,

      I do not see any reason it should be legal for public companies to buy back and retire their own shares. They were illegal until 1982 and I don’t see any reason why they shouldn’t be illegal again, so that’s one solution proposed by some Democratic senators.

      But if the argument made by financiers in favor of the legality of stock buybacks is that they’re “identical” to dividend distributions, then they ought to be treated identically: all shareholders should have to pay proportional taxes based on their proportional ownership of the company, exactly like they do with dividend distributions.

      The problem is when financiers make a technical argument about the equivalency between dividends and buybacks while hiding the ball: the tax advantages of buybacks for investors who do not participate, accumulate appreciated shares, and then donate or pass them to heirs tax free.

      —Indy

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Reminder: the buyback debate is about taxes, not corporate finance - Independently Financed says:
    February 12, 2019 at 1:08 pm

    […] readers know that the way to tell if a financier is lying about stock buybacks is to check if their mouth is […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Free and discounted “micromobility” services
  • How to think about stockpiling Series I savings bonds
  • Preserving your eligibility for paid family and medical leave
  • Schwab’s forthcoming direct indexing platform might be worth a look for the merely affluent
  • If supply and the rate of profit were fixed, then all wage increases would be inflationary (they’re not)

Recent Comments

  • Irene on Inflation-proofing your life
  • Inflation-proofing your life - Independently Financed on Inflation is a transfer from creditors to debtors (that means you)
  • Paul on Smart people overestimate the difficulty of maximizing the interest earned on savings
  • John on “Charitable clumping” is a clever marketing campaign, not a tax planning strategy
  • indyfinance on My paid family leave journey: Introduction

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017

Categories

  • affordable luxuries
  • better billionaire project
  • book review
  • cheap lessons
  • fire
  • free business idea
  • health insurance
  • higher education
  • insurance
  • investing
  • over there
  • personal finance
  • rant
  • real estate
  • self-employment
  • social security
  • student loans
  • taxes
  • Uncategorized

Newsletter

Copyright © 2022 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in