• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Saverocity
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Support the Site
  • The Free-quent Flyer

Independently Financed

Independently Financed

The Fidelity “dead accounts” study is fake, not wrong

August 1, 2019 by indyfinance 17 Comments

Become a Patron!

I’ve noticed an interesting phenomenon, which I call “common knowledge about common knowledge” (doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue, I know). It’s when some piece of conventional wisdom becomes so banal that someone decides to refute it, and then the refutation becomes as widely known as the original factoid, if not more so.

To give an easy example, “everyone knows” that vitamin C strengthens your immune system. But “everyone” also “knows” that’s ridiculous folk wisdom based on a single poorly conducted study in the early 20th century.

The problem is this can cause people to overcorrect, and end up saying “actually vitamin C has no health effects.”

Except vitamin C really is essential to human health!

There’s no Fidelity “dead accounts” study

An ancient piece of financial lore holds that one day, the beancounters at Fidelity decided to study the performance of every account at the firm in order to identify what characteristics were shared by the accounts yielding the highest returns. Small stocks, big stocks, domestic stocks, foreign stocks, frequent trading, infrequent trading, they looked at everything.

After months of crunching the data, the beancounters made a shocking discovery: there was one account type that consistently outperformed all the others. The accounts of dead people! It turned out that people who did no trading in their accounts whatsoever had higher long-term returns than any other strategy.

Now, if you think about this for even a moment, you’ll realize it doesn’t make any sense. How many accounts could Fidelity possibly have in the names of dead people (another version sometimes includes “people who had moved and forgotten about their accounts”)? If Fidelity could easily identify dead accountholders, why hadn’t they notified the appropriate authorities already?

Today, people gleefully debunk the apocryphal Fidelity study.

The Fidelity study is fake, not wrong

Whenever I see a reaction like this building, whether it’s “actually vitamin C doesn’t make you healthy” or “actually a dead person’s account would not achieve better returns than an actively managed account,” I like to take a second to ask, what if the conventional wisdom was right all along?

To find out, I used Morningstar’s portfolio tool to check the performance of two portfolios: a simple 60/40 portfolio using the Vanguard 500 (VFINX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market (VBMFX), and a Boglehead 3-fund portfolio substituting a 12% allocation to Vanguard Total International Stock (VGTSX). The 2-fund portfolio performance goes back to 1986, and the 3-fund portfolio to 1996. In both cases, I selected reinvested dividends and capital gains.

For each portfolio, I checked its annual return (and the final value of an initial investment of $100,000) with a monthly, quarterly, semiannual, and annual rebalance, and with no rebalance at all.

For the 2-fund portfolio dating back to 1986, the average annualized returns (and final value) for each rebalance selection were:

  • Monthly: 8.73% ($1,526,134)
  • Quarterly: 8.79% (1,553,836)
  • Semiannual: 8.71% ($1,517,894)
  • Annual: 8.73% ($1,526,244)
  • No rebalance: 9.02% ($1,665,050)

Here are the same values for the 3-fund portfolio since 1996 (the pattern is similar for the 2-fund portfolio over the same period):

  • Monthly: 7.06% ($486,314)
  • Quarterly: 7.16% ($496,945)
  • Semiannual: 7.28% ($510,056)
  • Annual: 7.32% ($514,528)
  • No Rebalance: 7.07% ($487,180)

Conclusion

I like this data precisely because it lends itself to multiple interpretations. Looking at the two-fund portfolio since 1986, you’d conclude no rebalancing at all yields the highest returns — the fake Fidelity was right all along, the best investor is a dead investor!

On the other hand, the three-fund data since 1996 suggests annual rebalancing yields the highest returns — having a pulse matters after all.

If you’re reading this, I’ll go ahead and assume you have a pulse, so allow me to split the difference: if you’re invested in a simple 2-fund, 3-fund, or 4-fund portfolio, you’re almost certainly rebalancing too often. If you’re rebalancing monthly, consider switching to quarterly. If you’re rebalancing quarterly, consider switching to semiannually (perhaps on the equinoctes?). And if you’re rebalancing semiannually, consider switching to annually. If you’re rebalancing annually, your blood is already ice cold and you don’t need my advice.

The logic is simple: when you rebalance a portfolio, you’re by definition selling your winners and buying your losers. But the tendency of assets, especially over short periods, is for winners to keep winning and losers to keep losing, meaning frequent rebalances move you out of assets that are performing well and into assets that are performing poorly.

There are good reasons to do that, for example if you are targeting a particular balance in lower-performing, more stable assets, in anticipation of a near-term expense. One of the benefits of diversification is that it tends to increase your risk-adjusted return. But while risk-adjusted returns are an important metric when designing a portfolio, you can’t eat them. For that, you need the ordinary kind.

Become a Patron!

Filed Under: investing, personal finance

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. John Wang says

    April 11, 2020 at 11:23 pm

    Holy smokes man, you’re missing the entire point of the Fidelity Dead Accounts study… you can’t do your own version of the study because you don’t have access to the data on how people manipulated their accounts — either sold too early, rebalanced too late, moved into riskier stocks, etc.

    What you did in your article is compare rebalancing vs. non-rebalancing. Don’t assume someone being alive and touching account would mean only doing that. That is very different.

    Reply
    • Silvano says

      June 15, 2021 at 3:33 pm

      I can’t believe you actually did any research on this topic because if you had you would have noticed tons of reputable articles confirming and detailing it. Literally took me 30 seconds to Google and verify. Here’s one of the articles.

      https://www.businessinsider.com/forgetful-investors-performed-best-2014-9

      Reply
      • indyfinance says

        June 15, 2021 at 4:43 pm

        Silvano,

        That article does not contain the information you say it does.

        —Indy

        Reply
  2. E Krever says

    January 10, 2021 at 5:26 pm

    I had a portfolio invested in 2002 that I forgot about. In March of 2020 when the market had just lost a great deal from trumps virus it was still up 800 percent. I sold it in late summer at close to 975 percent.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Are there 529 plans so bad they aren't worth their state's income tax benefits? - Independently Financed says:
    August 28, 2019 at 2:36 pm

    […] savings vehicles, invest in a basket of diversified, low-cost assets, and periodically (but not too often!) […]

    Reply
  2. Are You An Investor or A Trader? – Mindfully Investing says:
    October 3, 2019 at 5:46 pm

    […] – Some people claim that the study underpinning this idea is apocryphal.  However, it was seriously discussed by Barry Ritholtz and James O’Shaughnessy in a 2014 […]

    Reply
  3. The Danger of Not Checking Your Portfolio (I've Made a Huge Mistake) - Physician on FIRE says:
    April 7, 2020 at 2:55 am

    […] There is no such study, apparently (it was investors who forgot they had accounts with Fidelity), but the dead guy story persists to better drive home a point, and it’s a powerful one. In many cases, it’s better to lock the door and throw away the key than it is to open the door twice a day to make sure everything is okay. […]

    Reply
  4. The Danger of Not Checking Your Portfolio (I’ve Made a Huge Mistake) | Passive Income M.D. says:
    May 1, 2021 at 5:00 am

    […] There is no such study, apparently (it was investors who forgot they had accounts with Fidelity), but the dead guy story persists to better drive home a point, and it’s a powerful one. In many cases, it’s better to lock the door and throw away the key than it is to open the door twice a day to make sure everything is okay. […]

    Reply
  5. The Danger of Not Checking Your Portfolio (I’ve Made a Huge Mistake) – My Blog says:
    May 1, 2021 at 5:51 am

    […] There is no such study, apparently (it was investors who forgot they had accounts with Fidelity), but the dead guy story persists to better drive home a point, and it’s a powerful one. In many cases, it’s better to lock the door and throw away the key than it is to open the door twice a day to make sure everything is okay. […]

    Reply
  6. The Danger of Not Checking Your Portfolio (I’ve Made a Huge Mistake) – Own Your Hustle says:
    May 1, 2021 at 6:53 am

    […] There is no such study, apparently (it was investors who forgot they had accounts with Fidelity), but the dead guy story persists to better drive home a point, and it’s a powerful one. In many cases, it’s better to lock the door and throw away the key than it is to open the door twice a day to make sure everything is okay. […]

    Reply
  7. The Danger of Not Checking Your Portfolio (I’ve Made a Huge Mistake) - WorldTwit says:
    May 1, 2021 at 7:06 am

    […] There is no such study, apparently (it was investors who forgot they had accounts with Fidelity), but the dead guy story persists to better drive home a point, and it’s a powerful one. In many cases, it’s better to lock the door and throw away the key than it is to open the door twice a day to make sure everything is okay. […]

    Reply
  8. The Danger of Not Checking Your Portfolio (I’ve Made a Huge Mistake) – Smart Magazine says:
    May 3, 2021 at 2:00 pm

    […] There is no such study, apparently (it was investors who forgot they had accounts with Fidelity), but the dead guy story persists to better drive home a point, and it’s a powerful one. In many cases, it’s better to lock the door and throw away the key than it is to open the door twice a day to make sure everything is okay. […]

    Reply
  9. The Danger of Not Checking Your Portfolio (I’ve Made a Huge Mistake) – ColorMag General News says:
    May 13, 2021 at 8:10 am

    […] There is no such study, apparently (it was investors who forgot they had accounts with Fidelity), but the dead guy story persists to better drive home a point, and it’s a powerful one. In many cases, it’s better to lock the door and throw away the key than it is to open the door twice a day to make sure everything is okay. […]

    Reply
  10. More News. More Often says:
    August 1, 2021 at 1:10 am

    […] at Fidelity wanted to find out who the brokerage firm’s best investors were, he found that the best investors were all dead. The moral of that story is that people are often too active in the markets, selling their winners […]

    Reply
  11. Should You Choose Investing or Trading? - The Passive Sales System says:
    August 1, 2021 at 1:53 am

    […] at Fidelity wanted to find out who the brokerage firm’s best investors were, he found that the best investors were all dead. The moral of that story is that people are often too active in the markets, selling their winners […]

    Reply
  12. 投資成績がよかった人の属性「1位、亡くなっている人」は間違いである – 20代メーカー営業マンが資産運用を始めてみた says:
    September 27, 2021 at 5:56 am

    […] Independently FinancedThe Fidelity "dead accounts" study is fake, not wrong – Independent.… […]

    Reply
  13. 狼狽売りをしないために。調査結果から学ぶ『ほったらかし』の優位性 | じょんのブログ says:
    October 1, 2021 at 5:04 am

    […] The Fidelity "dead accounts" study is fake, not wrong – Independently FinancedBecome a Patron!I’ve… […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Free and discounted “micromobility” services
  • How to think about stockpiling Series I savings bonds
  • Preserving your eligibility for paid family and medical leave
  • Schwab’s forthcoming direct indexing platform might be worth a look for the merely affluent
  • If supply and the rate of profit were fixed, then all wage increases would be inflationary (they’re not)

Recent Comments

  • Irene on Inflation-proofing your life
  • Inflation-proofing your life - Independently Financed on Inflation is a transfer from creditors to debtors (that means you)
  • Paul on Smart people overestimate the difficulty of maximizing the interest earned on savings
  • John on “Charitable clumping” is a clever marketing campaign, not a tax planning strategy
  • indyfinance on My paid family leave journey: Introduction

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017

Categories

  • affordable luxuries
  • better billionaire project
  • book review
  • cheap lessons
  • fire
  • free business idea
  • health insurance
  • higher education
  • insurance
  • investing
  • over there
  • personal finance
  • rant
  • real estate
  • self-employment
  • social security
  • student loans
  • taxes
  • Uncategorized

Newsletter

Copyright © 2022 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in