My favorite part here ;-) Man, I'd love to sock away that kind of money a year!
Don't get me wrong, not saying that is easy, the question was designed to illicit more information about the size and type of step #4 savings. The vacilation between funding the 401K gave me the impression that we weren't looking at a case where someone was able to easily fund the full $18K +$5500 so that might mean the last part (savings) was a low balance.
The low balance in the savings would tie into questions on how to allocate it.
IE If a person has a nice 401(k) but low savings maybe there is an Emergency Fund threat - maybe savings is that, and advising munis or other investments in brokerage wouldn't be suitable.
Whereas, if the 23.5K was easy, I would imagine it more likely that savings had a high balance and strong replacement ratio, meaning taking on more risk would be a wiser move.
The steps seemed a little illogical, and later we learned that this is how he started out saving, but isn't really indicative of what he currently does. As he mentions here (and you agree with)
that's how I started and just keep upping the % over the years. I think someone who's just starting out should at least do #1 and #2.
This sounds reasonable - it is just when I see someone doing a step 3 and 4 on top of that where I ask what's going on, as it seems odd. Current steps would be:
- Fund 401k 18K
- Fund Roth 5.5K
- Fund Savings
Unless something was funky (and they couldn't fund 23.5K...)