Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Forums
Starting Out
New Blog Posts
Christopher Elliott: Consumers must do better job of obeying corporate overlords
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
<p>[QUOTE="pfdigest, post: 17202"]</p><p>Writing in the USA Today, “consumer advocate” Christopher Elliott <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/2014/08/18/travel-hacking-discount-code/14223775/">has this lovely little passage in an article about travel hacking</a>:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Another well-known hack involves signing up for a credit card that allows you to collect frequent-flier miles and then buying items such as gift cards only for the bonus points, known as “manufactured spending.” Then you convert the the item back into cash and pocket the points.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Again, it’s totally legal — and totally wrong. The cards are meant to reward real spending. Exploiting these payment systems only forces the companies offering them to tighten their rules, which can affect all cardholders.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p></p><p>This is a rather silly thing to say for somebody whose byline identifies him as a “consumer advocate”. Apparently the man on the street is first supposed to divine the pure, true, and real meaning behind credit card rewards programs, and then to leave money on the table when actions are opposed to that meaning.</p><p></p><p>Are banks somehow coerced by evil consumers into handing over points and miles? No. Generous credit card bonuses are a gamble on the part of banks, the gamble being that interest income and fees will be greater then interest expense and bonuses. Banks are free to convey “meaning” to consumers by reducing or capping the bonuses at any time.</p><p></p><p>And note that banks like to use the word “unlimited” in their marketing copy (see <a href="http://saverocity.com/pfdigest/a-100000-bank-bonus-and-the-citi-5-card-returns-plus-some-free-movies/">here</a> and <a href="http://saverocity.com/pfdigest/the-chase-aarp-credit-card-is-back-baby/">here</a>). In marketing promotions, you want to maximize the perceived value (hence “unlimited”) while minimizing the actual cost. If they don’t want people getting unlimited rewards, then they shouldn’t market unlimited rewards.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://saverocity.com/pfdigest/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2014/08/cabin-boy.jpg"><img src="http://saverocity.com/pfdigest/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2014/08/cabin-boy.jpg" data-url="http://saverocity.com/pfdigest/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2014/08/cabin-boy.jpg" class="bbImage " style="" alt="" title="" /></a></p><p>No, not that Chris Elliott, the other one</p><p></p><p></p><p>(H/T: <a href="http://travelbloggerbuzz.com/elliott-travel-hacking-burning-1-million-points-2014-progress-flyer-talk-trolling-entertainment/">TBB</a>)</p><p></p><p><a href="http://saverocity.com/pfdigest/christopher-elliott-consumers-must-better-job-obeying-corporate-overlords/">Continue reading...</a></p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="pfdigest, post: 17202"] Writing in the USA Today, “consumer advocate” Christopher Elliott [URL='http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/2014/08/18/travel-hacking-discount-code/14223775/']has this lovely little passage in an article about travel hacking[/URL]: [INDENT] Another well-known hack involves signing up for a credit card that allows you to collect frequent-flier miles and then buying items such as gift cards only for the bonus points, known as “manufactured spending.” Then you convert the the item back into cash and pocket the points. Again, it’s totally legal — and totally wrong. The cards are meant to reward real spending. Exploiting these payment systems only forces the companies offering them to tighten their rules, which can affect all cardholders. [/INDENT] This is a rather silly thing to say for somebody whose byline identifies him as a “consumer advocate”. Apparently the man on the street is first supposed to divine the pure, true, and real meaning behind credit card rewards programs, and then to leave money on the table when actions are opposed to that meaning. Are banks somehow coerced by evil consumers into handing over points and miles? No. Generous credit card bonuses are a gamble on the part of banks, the gamble being that interest income and fees will be greater then interest expense and bonuses. Banks are free to convey “meaning” to consumers by reducing or capping the bonuses at any time. And note that banks like to use the word “unlimited” in their marketing copy (see [URL='http://saverocity.com/pfdigest/a-100000-bank-bonus-and-the-citi-5-card-returns-plus-some-free-movies/']here[/URL] and [URL='http://saverocity.com/pfdigest/the-chase-aarp-credit-card-is-back-baby/']here[/URL]). In marketing promotions, you want to maximize the perceived value (hence “unlimited”) while minimizing the actual cost. If they don’t want people getting unlimited rewards, then they shouldn’t market unlimited rewards. [URL='http://saverocity.com/pfdigest/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2014/08/cabin-boy.jpg'][IMG]http://saverocity.com/pfdigest/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2014/08/cabin-boy.jpg[/IMG][/URL] No, not that Chris Elliott, the other one (H/T: [URL='http://travelbloggerbuzz.com/elliott-travel-hacking-burning-1-million-points-2014-progress-flyer-talk-trolling-entertainment/']TBB[/URL]) [url="http://saverocity.com/pfdigest/christopher-elliott-consumers-must-better-job-obeying-corporate-overlords/"]Continue reading...[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Preview
Name
Verification
What is the name of Joe's Podcast?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Starting Out
New Blog Posts
Christopher Elliott: Consumers must do better job of obeying corporate overlords
Top